Essay: Google’s clash with the Chinese government over Internet censorship (1,800-2,000 words)

Essay: Google’s clash with the Chinese government over Internet censorship (1,800-2,000 words) 150 150 Affordable Capstone Projects Written from Scratch

Essay Question: Google’s clash with the Chinese government over Internet censorship in 2010 has been widely interpreted by Western politicians and mainstream media as a case of “good vs. evil” (a Western media corporation that defends the freedom of speech principle took on China’s repressive authoritarian regime). Provide a thorough investigation into the case and then have a critical analysis of the argument.

Here is a possible approach to the question


Google refused to be part of the Chinese internet after its business was frustrated by the country’s internet censorship policies. Google, like most western internet companies, respects the American business ethics and adherence to human rights. Censorship is against the spirit of international human rights. Moreover, there is no reason people should be stopped from sharing information online or offline, or restrict people from searching for the information they want. The company has a strong internet platform and, as a result, had a right to refuse conducting its business in accordance with protectionist policies as this would make it part of the problem instead of the solution.

Critical analysis

Technology has evolved significantly to a point where the internet has become a fundamental aspect of human life. In fact, the internet may soon become a human right given its impact on the normal functioning of modern day society. When most people want to search information online, they are likely to use Google’s search function given that it is the leading internet service company. As a result, people have a right to access the company’s services, as part of the company’s spirit of upholding fundamental human rights.

The company believes that everyone deserves to be given a chance to be heard, to succeed, and to learn through the internet, a belief that is reflected in its mission. If the company’s mission is not possible in a country where it ventures, it has a right to withdraw its services. Withdrawing its services is, in fact, an indirect way of supporting human rights by refusing to comply with protectionist policies that violate these rights*************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************


Chu, C. W. (2017). Censorship or Protectionism? Reassessing China’s Regulation of Internet Industry.             International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 7(1), 28.

Now you should be confident enough to order a fresh copy of this assignment with us. See the new order page below to begin the journey!