‘social science’Discussion of if people have claims of souls

* Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people’s souls, but otherwise had no discernible effect on that person. How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible? Why or why not?

NOTE:

1. MUST BE 300 WORDS

2. NO MLA FORMATTING REQUIRED

3. SHOULD BE A++

4. NO PLAGARISM

5. EVIDENCE OF CRITICAL THOUGHT WITH EXAMPLES

UNDERSTANDING OF THE RELEVANT THEORIES AND CONCEPTS

TO GET THIS OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT DONE FOR YOU FROM SCRATCH, PLACE A NEW ORDER HERE