* Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people’s souls, but otherwise had no discernible effect on that person. How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible? Why or why not?
1. MUST BE 300 WORDS
2. NO MLA FORMATTING REQUIRED
3. SHOULD BE A++
4. NO PLAGARISM
5. EVIDENCE OF CRITICAL THOUGHT WITH EXAMPLES
UNDERSTANDING OF THE RELEVANT THEORIES AND CONCEPTS
TO GET THIS OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT DONE FOR YOU FROM SCRATCH, PLACE A NEW ORDER HERE